The Gloom-and-Doom Disease: Should Woody Allens Have a Home in the Manual of Mental Illness? | Scientific American Blog Network

More on the Manual of Mental Illness (DSM) debate – great title but it does pose one of the real issues in terms of what is within the ‘normal’ range of personalities and behaviours, and what needs to be treated.

The Gloom-and-Doom Disease: Should Woody Allens Have a Home in the Manual of Mental Illness? | Scientific American Blog Network.

And a good collection of quotes from the debate:

They Said What?: Some Great Quotes From the DSM-5 Hubbub

Quote from Dr. Allen Frances:

“In fact, my criticisms of DSM 5 arise precisely from its obvious failure to be an impartial, meticulous, and consensus academic endeavor. DSM 5 has suffered from a fatal combination of excessive ambition, sloppy method, and closed process. It fully deserves the concerted opposition it has generated from forty-seven professional organizations, the world press, the Society of Biological Psychiatry, the Lancet, and the general public.”

And his op-ed from the New York Times:

Diagnosing the DSM

Psychiatric diagnosis is simply too important to be left exclusively in the hands of psychiatrists. They will always be an essential part of the mix but should no longer be permitted to call all the shots.

Advertisements

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s